No functional comparison – a different architectural approach. ANYVA unites GRC disciplines on a common data model rather than managing them side-by-side.
These features concern the underlying architecture – and thus the way effort is generated or avoided.
Classic tools manage documents. Relationships between processes, risks, and measures are created manually – or not at all.
ANYVA models real business processes as a starting point. VVT, risks, TOMs and DSFA arise directly from this – connected, not isolated.
Data protection and information security are mostly managed in separate systems. This creates duplicate work and inconsistent assessments.
ANYVA uses a common data model for DSMS and ISMS. Processes, risks, and measures apply to both areas simultaneously.
Technical and organisational measures are maintained separately for data protection and ISMS – leading to contradictions and redundancies.
In ANYVA, a TOM is created once and acts simultaneously in DSMS and ISMS. No duplicate maintenance effort, no inconsistencies.
Data protection impact assessments are often created as text documents – without any connection to existing risk assessments or organisational and technical measures.
ANYVA generates the DSFA directly from process and risk data. The result is reproducible, fully documented, and auditable.
Complex legal obligations from GDPR, NIS-2, or ISO 27001 are difficult to translate into operational measures.
ANYVA translates requirements into testable, understandable modules – with assignments to processes, responsible parties, and evidence.
CVEs are managed in isolation within scanner tools. The impact on data privacy risks and compliance requirements remains invisible.
CVEs are directly linked to affected assets, processes, and GDPR risks within ANYVA. The compliance link arises automatically.
PDCA cycles often stall at status fields. Whether measures are effective is not systematically checked or documented.
ANYVA covers the complete PDCA cycle – with documented effectiveness checks, deviation analyses, and traceable improvements.
Shortly before audits, evidence is compiled manually. What's missing is often only noticed by the auditor.
ANYVA generates a complete audit trail in live operation – with a timestamp and justification for every decision. Accessible at any time.
GRC systems often require months of implementation projects before their first practical added value can be realised.
ANYVA provides pre-built process frameworks, requirement modules and TOM catalogues. Organisations can start working in a structured way immediately.
GRC systems are either designed for large enterprises and are over-engineered or too simplistic for complex requirements.
ANYVA is multi-client capable and scalable: equally suitable for advisory firms with multiple clients as for internal compliance teams.
Process Architecture
The 10 structural features are not isolated functions – they arise from a common process model that connects all areas.
PDCA as a true working logic
ANYVA does not map the PDCA cycle as status fields, but as a traceable audit and improvement logic – with documented results at each step.
Less duplication of effort between GDPR documentation and ISMS. Verifiable evidence without manual compilation.
ISMS and DSMS on a data model. Asset changes and vulnerabilities immediately visible in the GRC context.
Comprehensive overview of risks and open actions. Resilient basis for audits and authority requests.
Multi-tenant and scalable. A platform for multiple clients with clearly separated data areas.
Methodological difference
Many tools offer an AI chatbot. ANYVA takes a different approach: AI is integrated into the professional structure and can therefore provide context-related support.
In a demo, we'll show you how these structures can be implemented within your organisation.